Douglas v. State

824 So. 2d 256, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11268, 2002 WL 1798913
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 7, 2002
DocketNo. 4D02-1294
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 824 So. 2d 256 (Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas v. State, 824 So. 2d 256, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11268, 2002 WL 1798913 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 812.13(1) and 3(b), Fla. Stat. (1997) (provides that robbery occurs if force or intimidation is used “prior to or contemporaneous' with, or subsequent to the taking of the property ....”) (emphasis added); see State v. Baker, 540 So.2d 847, 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (legislature amended statute to repeal rule in Royal v. State, 490 So.2d 44 (Fla.1986)).

GUNTHER, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adlington v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
824 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
824 So. 2d 256, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11268, 2002 WL 1798913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.