Douglas v. State

824 So. 2d 256, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11268, 2002 WL 1798913
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 2002·No. No. 4D02-1294·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 812.13(1) and 3(b), Fla. Stat. (1997) (provides that robbery occurs if force or intimidation is used “prior to or contemporaneous' with, or subsequent to the taking of the property ....”) (emphasis added); see State v. Baker, 540 So.2d 847, 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (legislature amended statute to repeal rule in Royal v. State, 490 So.2d 44 (Fla.1986)).

GUNTHER, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. State, 824 So. 2d 256, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11268, 2002 WL 1798913 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

824 So. 2d 256 (Douglas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adlington v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
824 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)