Douglas v. State
353 So. 2d 1279, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Douglas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16542 →
Opinion
The judgment appealed from is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of the appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed, as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Speller v. State, 305 So.2d 231 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). Appellant need not be present for this purpose.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Douglas v. State, 353 So. 2d 1279, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14874 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
353 So. 2d 1279 (Douglas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Speller v. State
305 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Smith v. State
310 So. 2d 770 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)