Douglas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Douglas v. State

240 So. 2d 649, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5640

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 10, 1970

DocketNo. 70-239

StatusPublished

This text of 240 So. 2d 649 (Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Douglas v. State, 240 So. 2d 649, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5640 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points on appeal that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude [650]*650that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Williams v. State, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 913; Bruton v. State, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 669. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points on appeal that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude [650]*650that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Williams v. State, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 913; Bruton v. State, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 669. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 So. 2d 649, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack