Home/Supreme Court of Delaware/Douglas v. State

Douglas v. State

974 A.2d 857, 2009 WL 1525931
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Douglas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 3 A.3d 1096 →
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided June 2, 2009·No. 96, 2009·Published

Opinion

DARRYL E. DOUGLAS, Defendant Below-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below-Appellee.

No. 96, 2009.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: April 16, 2009.
Decided: June 2, 2009.

Before HOLLAND, BERGER, and JACOBS, Justices.

ORDER

CAROLYN BERGER, Justice.

This 2nd day of June 2009, after careful consideration of appellant's opening brief and the State's motion to affirm, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision dated February 12, 2009. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant's motion for postconviction relief was time-barred and previously adjudicated and that appellant had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. State, 974 A.2d 857, 2009 WL 1525931 (Del. 2009).

974 A.2d 857 (Douglas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.