Douglas v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Douglas v. State

94 So. 924, 19 Ala. App. 679

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 19, 1922

Docket6 Div. 120.

StatusPublished

This text of 94 So. 924 (Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Douglas v. State, 94 So. 924, 19 Ala. App. 679 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of robbery, and sentenced to 10 years’ impris- *680 onmcnt. Tho appeal is upon the record proper, without bill of exceptions, and the time for filing a bill of exceptions has expired. An examination of the record discloses no error. The proceedings appear to have l?een regular in every respect. There being no error apparent on the record, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of robbery, and sentenced to 10 years’ impris- *680 onmcnt. Tho appeal is upon the record proper, without bill of exceptions, and the time for filing a bill of exceptions has expired. An examination of the record discloses no error. The proceedings appear to have l?een regular in every respect. There being no error apparent on the record, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 So. 924, 19 Ala. App. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-state-alactapp-1922.