Douglas v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Douglas v. State

94 So. 924, 19 Ala. App. 679

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 1922·No. 6 Div. 120.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of robbery, and sentenced to 10 years’ impris- *680 onmcnt. Tho appeal is upon the record proper, without bill of exceptions, and the time for filing a bill of exceptions has expired. An examination of the record discloses no error. The proceedings appear to have l?een regular in every respect. There being no error apparent on the record, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of robbery, and sentenced to 10 years’ impris- *680 onmcnt. Tho appeal is upon the record proper, without bill of exceptions, and the time for filing a bill of exceptions has expired. An examination of the record discloses no error. The proceedings appear to have l?een regular in every respect. There being no error apparent on the record, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Douglas v. State, 94 So. 924, 19 Ala. App. 679 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

94 So. 924 (Douglas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.