Douglas v. Singer Manufacturing Co.

27 S.E. 664, 102 Ga. 560, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 572
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 21, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 27 S.E. 664 (Douglas v. Singer Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas v. Singer Manufacturing Co., 27 S.E. 664, 102 Ga. 560, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 572 (Ga. 1897).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. Nothing is better settled than that an affidavit of illegality can not, when the defendant has had his day in court, go behind the judgment the progress of which is sought to be arrested.

2. That the defendant in execution “was not allowed to point out property in his possession sufficient to pay the debt,” is not a good ground of illegality. Whatever may be the rights of such a defendant under section 5423 of the Civil Code, he can avail himself thereof only by actually pointing out the property upon which he desires the levy to be made.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LR SAMS COMPANY, INC. v. Hardy
126 S.E.2d 661 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Payne v. Daniel
22 S.E.2d 47 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Mulling v. Bank of Cobbtown
135 S.E. 222 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Banks v. Giles
92 S.E. 651 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Bedingfield v. First National Bank
61 S.E. 30 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 S.E. 664, 102 Ga. 560, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-singer-manufacturing-co-ga-1897.