Douglas v. Singer Manufacturing Co.

27 S.E. 664, 102 Ga. 560, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 572
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 21, 1897·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. Nothing is better settled than that an affidavit of illegality can not, when the defendant has had his day in court, go behind the judgment the progress of which is sought to be arrested.

2. That the defendant in execution “was not allowed to point out property in his possession sufficient to pay the debt,” is not a good ground of illegality. Whatever may be the rights of such a defendant under section 5423 of the Civil Code, he can avail himself thereof only by actually pointing out the property upon which he desires the levy to be made.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. Singer Manufacturing Co., 27 S.E. 664, 102 Ga. 560, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 572 (Ga. 1897).

27 S.E. 664 (Douglas v. Singer Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LR SAMS COMPANY, INC. v. Hardy
126 S.E.2d 661 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Payne v. Daniel
22 S.E.2d 47 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Mulling v. Bank of Cobbtown
135 S.E. 222 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Banks v. Giles
92 S.E. 651 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Bedingfield v. First National Bank
61 S.E. 30 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)