Douglas v. Parsons-May-Oberschmidt Co.

57 So. 624, 101 Miss. 620
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1911·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause is dismissed for want- of prosecution, the motion to discharge the supersedeas and relieve the sureties on the bond is overruled, and judgment will be entered here against the sureties on the bond for the decree rendered, with the interest and damages thereon as provided by law. The decree appealed from was a final one, and the bond, whether technically accurate or not, served the purpose for which it was intended. It may. be, as stated by the bondsmen, that they were misled by appellant into signing the bond, and that one of them notified the clerk, before the bond was filed, not to approve the same; but these matters cannot be adjudicated on this motion, or, for that matter, by this court on original proceeding here. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. Parsons-May-Oberschmidt Co., 57 So. 624, 101 Miss. 620 (Mich. 1911).

57 So. 624 (Douglas v. Parsons-May-Oberschmidt Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parsons-May-Oberschmidt Co. v. Furr
70 So. 895 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)
Rushing v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Plainview
160 S.W. 337 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)