Douglas v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Douglas v. New York State Division of Parole

269 A.D.2d 637, 701 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1067

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 637 (Douglas v. New York State Division of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Douglas v. New York State Division of Parole, 269 A.D.2d 637, 701 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered April 9, 1998 in Columbia County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, has reappeared before respondent since the April 1999 parole release hearing that gave rise to this proceeding and his request for release was again denied. Accordingly, the instant appeal is moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Muniz v New York State Div. of Parole, 264 AD2d 873).

[638]*638Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered April 9, 1998 in Columbia County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, has reappeared before respondent since the April 1999 parole release hearing that gave rise to this proceeding and his request for release was again denied. Accordingly, the instant appeal is moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Muniz v New York State Div. of Parole, 264 AD2d 873).

[638]*638Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 637, 701 N.Y.S.2d 923, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-new-york-state-division-of-parole-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack