Douglas v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.
162 N.E. 532, 248 N.Y. 580, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1385
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Murnan v. Wabash Ry. Co. (246 N. Y. 244).
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Douglas v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co., 162 N.E. 532, 248 N.Y. 580, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1385 (N.Y. 1928).
162 N.E. 532 (Douglas v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Willis v. Weil Pump Co.
130 F. Supp. 896 (S.D. New York, 1954)
Yesuvida v. Pennsylvania Railroad
200 Misc. 815 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
Mooney v. Denver & R. G. W. R.
221 P.2d 628 (Utah Supreme Court, 1950)
Reep v. Butcher
176 Misc. 369 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)
N. V. Brood en Beschuitfabriek V/H John Simons v. Aluminum Co. of America
231 A.D. 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Boright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
230 N.W. 457 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1930)
Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
279 U.S. 377 (Supreme Court, 1929)