Douglas v. Matherly
1933 OK 297, 21 P.2d 1057, 163 Okla. 283, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 718
Opinion
Plaintiffs in error have filed their brief supporting their appeal, but the defendant in error has failed to file brief or offer any excuse for his failure to do so. Upon the authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469, 106 P. 957, and many other cases, for failure to file brief the cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Douglas v. Matherly, 1933 OK 297, 21 P.2d 1057, 163 Okla. 283, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 718 (Okla. 1933).
1933 OK 297 (Douglas v. Matherly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellis v. Outler
1910 OK 9 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)