Douglas v. La Rica Consolidated

86 P. 858, 43 Wash. 715, 1906 Wash. LEXIS 775
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Douglas v. La Rica Consolidated. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Wash. 699
Washington Supreme Court·Decided August 30, 1906·No. No. 5693·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A decision in this case was rendered December 28, 1905. 41 Wash. 699, 83 Pac. 182. A petition for rehearing was subsequently interposed and denied, and the remittitur sent to the superior court. :Owing to a clerical error in the remittitur, it has been recalled. The case is now remanded to the superior court, with instructions to that court to consider the answer heretofore tendered to the clerk of said court by the defendant as being properly before the court for consideration; providing said answer is now with said clerk and that the fee for filing the same has been paid. If such answer is not in the possession of said clerk, or if the defendant within fifteen days from the filing of the remittitur elects to serve upon respondent’s attorneys of record and file another answer, it may do so. No costs shall he allowed to either party as against the other on account of any proceedings heretofore had in the superior court or in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. La Rica Consolidated, 86 P. 858, 43 Wash. 715, 1906 Wash. LEXIS 775 (Wash. 1906).

86 P. 858 (Douglas v. La Rica Consolidated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Douglas v. La Rica Consolidated
83 P. 182 (Washington Supreme Court, 1905)