Douglas v. Florida State Board of Regents
This text of 550 So. 2d 1173 (Douglas v. Florida State Board of Regents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record contains no evidence that the Florida State Board of Regents acted in a “capricious, prejudicial, or arbitrary manner.” Militana v. University of Miami, 236 So.2d 162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 962, 91 S.Ct. 970, 28 L.Ed.2d 245 (1971). No genuine issue of material fact exists and, as a matter of law, appellee is entitled to summary judgment in its favor. Anderson v. Maddox, 65 So.2d 299 (Fla.1953); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
550 So. 2d 1173, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2502, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5960, 1989 WL 125792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-florida-state-board-of-regents-fladistctapp-1989.