Douglas v. Florida State Board of Regents

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Douglas v. Florida State Board of Regents

550 So. 2d 1173, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2502, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5960, 1989 WL 125792

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Douglas v. Florida State Board of Regents. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4926 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 24, 1989·No. No. 88-2559·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record contains no evidence that the Florida State Board of Regents acted in a “capricious, prejudicial, or arbitrary manner.” Militana v. University of Miami, 236 So.2d 162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 962, 91 S.Ct. 970, 28 L.Ed.2d 245 (1971). No genuine issue of material fact exists and, as a matter of law, appellee is entitled to summary judgment in its favor. Anderson v. Maddox, 65 So.2d 299 (Fla.1953); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The record contains no evidence that the Florida State Board of Regents acted in a “capricious, prejudicial, or arbitrary manner.” Militana v. University of Miami, 236 So.2d 162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 962, 91 S.Ct. 970, 28 L.Ed.2d 245 (1971). No genuine issue of material fact exists and, as a matter of law, appellee is entitled to summary judgment in its favor. Anderson v. Maddox, 65 So.2d 299 (Fla.1953); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c).

Affirmed.

Douglas v. Florida State Board of Regents, 550 So. 2d 1173, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2502, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5960, 1989 WL 125792 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

550 So. 2d 1173 (Douglas v. Florida State Board of Regents) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related