Douglas v. Florida Department of Corrections

388 So. 2d 587
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 26, 1980·No. No. OO-420·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sua sponte, we dismiss this appeal since appellant has neglected a clear point of entry to Section 120.56 proceedings by filing a rule challenge before the Division of Administrative Hearings as required by Section 120.56(2), Florida Statutes (1979). See Krestview Nursing Home v. Dept. of Health, 381 So.2d 240 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Compare June Rice and Stephen Dudley Stitt v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 386 So.2d 844 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

The appeal is dismissed without prejudice to appellant’s right to initiate an administrative rule challenge proceeding under Section 120.56.

DISMISSED.

ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., and MELVIN, WOODROW M. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. Florida Department of Corrections, 388 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

388 So. 2d 587 (Douglas v. Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nord v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROB. COM'N
417 So. 2d 1176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Hunter v. Florida Department of Corrections
390 So. 2d 1227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Bowling v. Florida Department of Corrections
389 So. 2d 1031 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Slingerland v. Hurley
388 So. 2d 587 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)