Douglas v. Fassoulis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Douglas v. Fassoulis

16 A.D.2d 913, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9037

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 913 (Douglas v. Fassoulis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Douglas v. Fassoulis, 16 A.D.2d 913, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal as poor persons granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, upon condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points on the attorney for the judgment creditor-respondent and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellants’ points with this court on or before October 11, 1962, with notice of argument for October 23, 1962, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects the motion is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal as poor persons granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, upon condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points on the attorney for the judgment creditor-respondent and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellants’ points with this court on or before October 11, 1962, with notice of argument for October 23, 1962, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects the motion is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 913, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-fassoulis-nyappdiv-1962.