Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Douglas v. City of Dunedin

Douglas v. City of Dunedin

189 So. 2d 176
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 3, 1966·No. No. 6657·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HOBSON, Judge.

Upon examination of the record-on-appeal in the instant case it appears that the order appealed is not a final order but is interlocutory and, therefore, nonappealable. See Hancock, et al. v. Piper, Fla.1966, 186 So.2d 489.

For the reason stated this appeal is dismissed ex mero motu.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and MOODY, JAMES S., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. City of Dunedin, 189 So. 2d 176 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

189 So. 2d 176 (Douglas v. City of Dunedin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ringsmith v. Squibb
193 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Poling v. City Bank & Trust Company of St. Petersburg
189 So. 2d 176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)