Douglas v. City of Dunedin
189 So. 2d 176
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 1966
DocketNo. 6657
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 189 So. 2d 176 (Douglas v. City of Dunedin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Douglas v. City of Dunedin, 189 So. 2d 176 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).
Opinion
Upon examination of the record-on-appeal in the instant case it appears that the order appealed is not a final order but is interlocutory and, therefore, nonappealable. See Hancock, et al. v. Piper, Fla.1966, 186 So.2d 489.
For the reason stated this appeal is dismissed ex mero motu.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ringsmith v. Squibb
193 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Poling v. City Bank & Trust Company of St. Petersburg
189 So. 2d 176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
189 So. 2d 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-city-of-dunedin-fladistctapp-1966.