Douglas v. Austin-Western Road Machinery Co.

160 S.E. 409, 173 Ga. 386, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 320
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 17, 1931
DocketNo. 8052
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 160 S.E. 409 (Douglas v. Austin-Western Road Machinery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas v. Austin-Western Road Machinery Co., 160 S.E. 409, 173 Ga. 386, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 320 (Ga. 1931).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Austin-Western Boad Machinery Company brought mandamus proceedings against J. W. Douglas as chairman of the board of commissioners of roads and revenues of Bacon County, and all the other members thereof, to compel the levying of an extra or special tax to pay certain county warrants which had been issued to petitioner during the month of March, 1925, by a board of commissioners whose members at the time of the institution of this proceeding had gone out of office. Douglas and the other members of the board filed their demurrers, plea, and answer. At the hearing the respondents amended their plea and answer. After considering the case, the court overruled the demurrer, and made the mandamus absolute; and the respondents excepted.

This court is of the opinion that, under the facts alleged, the purchase, by the commissioners of roads and revenues from Austin-Western Boad Machinery Company, of certain material necessary to road building was such a contract as must be entered on the minutes of the commissioners, under the Civil Code, § 386. It is admitted that the contract was not entered as required by this section. Consequently the issuance of the warrants to pay off the purchase-price of the material was illegal, and the court was not authorized to issue a mandamus absolute, under which the commissioners are required to raise by taxation such specified amount annually as will finally pay the claim of the Boad Machinery Company. • That ruling was, of course, a fundamental error and requires a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Malcom v. Webb
86 S.E.2d 489 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Griffin v. Maddox
182 S.E. 847 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Douglas v. Austin-Western Road Machinery Co.
177 S.E. 912 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Austin-Western Road Machinery Co. v. Douglas
173 S.E. 386 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 S.E. 409, 173 Ga. 386, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-austin-western-road-machinery-co-ga-1931.