Douglas Stiltner v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, Washington

Ninth Circuit

Douglas Stiltner v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, Washington

367 F.2d 148

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 29, 1966

Docket20484

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 367 F.2d 148 (Douglas Stiltner v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Douglas Stiltner v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, Washington, 367 F.2d 148 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the order of the district court, 258 F.Supp. 487, dismissing appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus upon the grounds stated in the district court’s opinion of June 28, 1965. With respect to the allegation that appellant’s plea of guilty was coerced, we add that we have examined the record of the state evidentiary hearing, upon which the parties stipulated the present petitions might be decided (as noted in the district court’s order of November 23, 1964), and we are satisfied that the district court’s conclusion that appellant’s plea was voluntary is fully supported.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the order of the district court, 258 F.Supp. 487, dismissing appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus upon the grounds stated in the district court’s opinion of June 28, 1965. With respect to the allegation that appellant’s plea of guilty was coerced, we add that we have examined the record of the state evidentiary hearing, upon which the parties stipulated the present petitions might be decided (as noted in the district court’s order of November 23, 1964), and we are satisfied that the district court’s conclusion that appellant’s plea was voluntary is fully supported.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

367 F.2d 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-stiltner-v-b-j-rhay-superintendent-of-washington-state-ca9-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack