Douglas Ross v. Willie James Thompson, Warden Federal Correctional Institute--Morgantown

105 F.3d 648, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4399, 1997 WL 11353
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 14, 1997
Docket96-6776
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 F.3d 648 (Douglas Ross v. Willie James Thompson, Warden Federal Correctional Institute--Morgantown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas Ross v. Willie James Thompson, Warden Federal Correctional Institute--Morgantown, 105 F.3d 648, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4399, 1997 WL 11353 (4th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

105 F.3d 648

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Douglas ROSS, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Willie James THOMPSON, Warden; Federal Correctional
Institute--Morgantown, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 96-6776.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 1996.
Decided Jan. 14, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-48-1)

Douglas Ross, Appellant Pro Se.

Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Ross appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ross v. Thompson, No. CA-96-48-1 (N.D.W.Va. May 1, 1996).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

In light of this disposition, Appellant's motions to expedite and for bail pending appeal are denied as moot

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zakiya v. United States
267 F. Supp. 2d 47 (District of Columbia, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 F.3d 648, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4399, 1997 WL 11353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-ross-v-willie-james-thompson-warden-federa-ca4-1997.