Douglas Robins v. Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M.D.

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 20, 2021
Docket2021CW1274
StatusUnknown

This text of Douglas Robins v. Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M.D. (Douglas Robins v. Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas Robins v. Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M.D., (La. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DOUGLAS ROBINS, ET AL NO. 2021 CW 1274

VERSUS PAGE 1 OF 2

MOHAMMAD ZOHAIR PIRZADAH, M. D., ET AL

CONSOLIDATED WITH

DOUGLAS ROBINS AND KATHERINE ROBINS

VERSUS DECEMBER 20 , 2021 MOHAMMAD ZOHAIR PIRZADAH, M. D.,

AND CHARLES LANE PEARSON, JR., M. D.

In Re: Douglas Robins and Katherine Robins, applying for

supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court,

Parish of East Baton Rouge, Nos. 642149 c/ w 698066.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s August 26, 2021 ruling which disqualified John L. Hammons from serving as counsel

herein is reversed. The burden of proving disqualification of an attorney or other officer of the court rests on the party making the challenge. Succession of Armand, 2019- 751 ( La. App. 3rd Cir. 2/ 27/ 20), 297 So. 3d 37, 40, citing Walker v. State, Dept of

Transp. and Development, 2001- 2078, 2001- 2079 ( La. 5/ 14/ 02), 817 So. 2d 57, 60. When a party raises an exception or motion that must be proven, it party' s is that burden to present evidence

establishing the claims made therein. Landis Construction Co., LLC v. State of Louisiana, 2015- 1167 ( La. App. 1st Cir.

2/ 29/ 16), 199 So. 3d 1, 2. Here, although the parties attached

documents to their motions, these documents were never formally introduced. Evidence not properly and officially offered and

introduced cannot be considered, even if it is physically placed in the record. Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc., 2007- 2143 ( La. 5/ 21/ 08), 983 So. 2d 84, 88. Appellate courts are

courts of record and may not review evidence that is not in the appellate record, or receive new evidence. Id. Defendants, Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M. D. and Charles Lane Pearson, Jr., M. D., failed to meet their burden of proof, and therefore, we

find the trial court erred in granting the motion. The motion to

disqualify counsel is denied.

PMC JEW

Theriot, J., concurs. A lawyer is not likely to be a

necessary witness when evidence pertaining to each matter to which he could testify is available from another source. See Horaist v. Doctor' s Hospital of Opelousas, 255 F. 3d 261, 267 5th Cir. 2001). I find that based on the documents presented

and arguments asserted, defendants, Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M. D. and Charles Lane Pearson, Jr., M. D., will be able to STATE OF LOUISIANA

NO. 2021 CW 1274

PAGE 2 OF 2

support their defense against this nullity action using sources

other than Mr. Hammons' testimony. Therefore, I concur in

granting the writ and reversing the trial court' s August 25, 2021 ruling which disqualified John L. Hammons from serving as

counsel.

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horaist v. Doctor's Hospital of Opelousas
255 F.3d 261 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Walker v. STATE, DOTD
817 So. 2d 57 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2002)
Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc.
983 So. 2d 84 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2008)
Landis Construction Co. v. State
199 So. 3d 1 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Douglas Robins v. Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-robins-v-mohammad-zohair-pirzadah-md-lactapp-2021.