Douglas R. Modisette v. Doc's Painting, Inc.
This text of Douglas R. Modisette v. Doc's Painting, Inc. (Douglas R. Modisette v. Doc's Painting, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Douglas R. Modisette has filed a motion asking this court to dismiss his appeal because all matters in controversy have now been settled between the parties. The motion is granted. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.
The appeal is dismissed.
Ben Z. Grant
Justice
Date Submitted: April 16, 2002
Date Decided: April 16, 2002
Do Not Publish
r want of jurisdiction.
Donald R. Ross
Date Submitted: September 17, 2002
Date Decided: September 18, 2002
1. The record also shows the trial court entered a judgment nunc pro tunc February 15, 2002. The judgment nunc pro tunc corrected the original judgment to show the jury made an affirmative deadly weapon finding. Had the notice of appeal been filed ninety days from the date of the nunc pro tunc judgment, this Court would have jurisdiction to consider only the validity of the nunc pro tunc judgment. See Jones v. State, 795 S.W.2d 199, 202 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). However, the notice of appeal was also untimely with respect to the nunc pro tunc judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Douglas R. Modisette v. Doc's Painting, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-r-modisette-v-docs-painting-inc-texapp-2002.