Douglas Planing Mill & Novelty Co. v. Anderson

56 S.E. 635, 127 Ga. 571, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 432

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

Evidence that a named person, “manager for the plaintiff” (a corporation), owed the defendant a specified amount, for which such defendant set up a counter-claim by plea, of set-off, did not prove an in-' debtedness by the corporation or authorize a verdict to be directed ■ against it therefor.

Judgment reversed.

■All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Complaint. Before Judge O’Steen. Douglas superior court. November 23, 1905.

Lankford & Dickerson, for plaintiff.