Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Douglas Planing Mill & Novelty Co. v. Anderson

Douglas Planing Mill & Novelty Co. v. Anderson

56 S.E. 635, 127 Ga. 571, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 432
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 14, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 S.E. 635 (Douglas Planing Mill & Novelty Co. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas Planing Mill & Novelty Co. v. Anderson, 56 S.E. 635, 127 Ga. 571, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 432 (Ga. 1907).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

Evidence that a named person, “manager for the plaintiff” (a corporation), owed the defendant a specified amount, for which such defendant set up a counter-claim by plea, of set-off, did not prove an in-' debtedness by the corporation or authorize a verdict to be directed ■ against it therefor.

Judgment reversed.

■All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent. Complaint. Before Judge O’Steen. Douglas superior court. November 23, 1905. Lankford & Dickerson, for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brunson v. Bridges
202 S.E.2d 553 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 S.E. 635, 127 Ga. 571, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-planing-mill-novelty-co-v-anderson-ga-1907.