Douglas Paul Stanford v. Fred B. Pearce, Director, Oregon Corrections Division
This text of 1 F.3d 1247 (Douglas Paul Stanford v. Fred B. Pearce, Director, Oregon Corrections Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 F.3d 1247
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Douglas Paul STANFORD, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Fred B. PEARCE, Director, Oregon Corrections Division,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-36572.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 13, 1993*
Decided July 19, 1993.
Before GOODWIN, FARRIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
OVERVIEW
Douglas Paul Stanford, a state prisoner, appeals the district court's dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 and 2254. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its orders filed December 9, 1991 and June 16, 1992.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 F.3d 1247, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26565, 1993 WL 269609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-paul-stanford-v-fred-b-pearce-director-ore-ca9-1993.