Douglas Latham v. Barton Malow Co
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 3, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
148928-9 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman
Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra
Bridget M. McCormack
DOUGLAS LATHAM, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
v SC: 148928 COA: 312141 Oakland CC: 2004-059653-NO BARTON MALOW COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/ DOUGLAS LATHAM, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v SC: 148929 COA: 313606 Oakland CC: 2004-059653-NO BARTON MALOW COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 4, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether a significant number of workers were exposed to the high degree of risk identified by this Court in Latham v Barton Malow Co, 480 Mich 105, 114 (2008) (“the danger of working at heights without fall-protection equipment”). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
October 3, 2014
t0930 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Douglas Latham v. Barton Malow Co (Douglas Latham v. Barton Malow Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.