Douglas L. Leight, John H. Masten v. W7879 LLC
This text of Douglas L. Leight, John H. Masten v. W7879 LLC (Douglas L. Leight, John H. Masten v. W7879 LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 102 SSM 4 Douglas L. Leight, et al., Plaintiffs, John H. Masten, Appellant, v. W7879 LLC, et al., Respondents.
Submitted by Seth A. Miller, for appellant. Submitted by Patrick K. Munson, for respondents. Metropolitan Council on Housing, amicus curiae.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. Plaintiff John H. Masten failed to establish that his apartment, which was de-regulated in 2000 by an unchallenged order of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal, became re-regulated when he executed a renewal lease at market rate. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided March 24, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Douglas L. Leight, John H. Masten v. W7879 LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-l-leight-john-h-masten-v-w7879-llc-ny-2016.