Douglas L. Byrd v. State
This text of Douglas L. Byrd v. State (Douglas L. Byrd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00305-CR
Douglas L. BYRD, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CR-9871 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 16, 2010
DISMISSED
Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Douglas L. Byrd pled nolo contendere to burglary of
a habitation with intent to commit assault. As part of the plea bargain, Byrd signed a waiver of his
right to appeal. The trial court signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the
defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Byrd timely filed a notice of 04-10-00305-CR
appeal. An electronic clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and
a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).
We have reviewed the clerk’s record, and the trial court’s certification appears to accurately
state that this is a plea bargain case and Byrd does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154
S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to
determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a
certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.”
TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).
On May 4, 2010, we gave Byrd notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended
trial court certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record
by June 3, 2010. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.–San
Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet.
ref’d) (not designated for publication). An amended certification showing Byrd has the right to
appeal has not been filed. We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).
Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Douglas L. Byrd v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-l-byrd-v-state-texapp-2010.