Douglas Junco v. Carver

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 9, 2025
Docket24-14121
StatusUnpublished

This text of Douglas Junco v. Carver (Douglas Junco v. Carver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas Junco v. Carver, (11th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-14121 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 04/09/2025 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-14121 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

DOUGLAS JUNCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WARE STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants,

OFFICER CARVER,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-14121 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 04/09/2025 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 24-14121

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 5:23-cv-00027-BWC ____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and KIDD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Douglas Junco, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a timely notice of appeal from the district court’s order and judgment dismissing the case without prejudice. Junco also filed a timely construed motion to reconsider the order and judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). The district court granted that motion, vacated the order and judgment, and reopened the case for further proceed- ings. Junco’s amended complaint, and the remaining defendant’s motion to dismiss it, remain pending. We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the vacated dismissal order and judgment are “officially gone” and have “no legal effect whatever.” See United States v. Sigma Int’l, Inc., 300 F.3d 1278, 1280 (11th Cir. 2002) (en banc). For that reason, even if we concluded that the district court erred in its dismissal order, we could not give meaningful relief, so this appeal is moot. See Chris- tian Coal. of Fla., Inc. v. United States, 662 F.3d 1182, 1189 (11th Cir. 2011) (holding that we lack jurisdiction to hear moot issues); Friends of Everglades v. S. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist., 570 F.3d 1210, 1216 (11th Cir. 2009) (holding that an issue is moot when it no longer presents USCA11 Case: 24-14121 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 04/09/2025 Page: 3 of 3

24-14121 Opinion of the Court 3

a live controversy with respect to which the court can give mean- ingful relief). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Douglas Junco v. Carver, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-junco-v-carver-ca11-2025.