Douglas J Klein v. Hp Pelzer Automotive Systems Inc
This text of Douglas J Klein v. Hp Pelzer Automotive Systems Inc (Douglas J Klein v. Hp Pelzer Automotive Systems Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
February 4, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
149939 & (44) Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano DOUGLAS J. KLEIN and AMY NEUFELD Richard H. Bernstein, KLEIN, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, v SC: 149939 COA: 310670 Oakland CC: 2011-120823-CK HP PELZER AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 8, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion regarding bond is DENIED as moot.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 4, 2015 t0128 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Douglas J Klein v. Hp Pelzer Automotive Systems Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-j-klein-v-hp-pelzer-automotive-systems-inc-mich-2015.