Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz

Ninth Circuit

Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz

56 F.3d 71, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19856

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 16, 1995·No. 94-15421·Published

Opinion

56 F.3d 71w
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Douglas G. HOUSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rodney HAGEMAN; Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L.
White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-15421.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1995.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 71w
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Douglas G. HOUSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rodney HAGEMAN; Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L.
White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-15421.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1995.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz, 56 F.3d 71, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19856 (9th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

56 F.3d 71 (Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.