Douglas Flournoy v. State of Georgia

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 27, 2025
DocketA25D0448
StatusPublished

This text of Douglas Flournoy v. State of Georgia (Douglas Flournoy v. State of Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas Flournoy v. State of Georgia, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 27, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25D0448. DOUGLAS FLOURNOY v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

In 2019, Douglas Flournoy was convicted of rape and other offenses. Following the denial of his motion for a new trial, we dismissed Flournoy’s direct appeal due to his failure to comply with this Court’s briefing deadlines. See Case No. A24A0250 (Sept. 27, 2023). Back in the trial court, Flournoy filed an extraordinary motion for a new trial, which the trial court denied in March 2025. He then filed a motion for reconsideration, which the trial court denied in May 2025. Flournoy now files the instant application for discretionary review from the trial court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying his extraordinary motion for a new trial. We lack jurisdiction. The denial of a motion for reconsideration is not appealable in its own right, and a motion for reconsideration does not extend the time for filing an appellate challenge to an appealable order. See Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000); Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271, 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985). To the extent that Flournoy seeks to appeal the order denying his extraordinary motion for a new trial, his application is untimely. An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Consequently, Flournoy’s application, filed in June 2025 — more than two months after entry of the denial of his extraordinary motion for a new trial — is untimely. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this discretionary application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/27/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyle v. State of Georgia
380 S.E.2d 57 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Bell v. Cohran
536 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Savage v. Newsome
326 S.E.2d 5 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Douglas Flournoy v. State of Georgia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-flournoy-v-state-of-georgia-gactapp-2025.