Douglas Elliman LLC v. 21-45 44th Drive LLC

113 A.D.3d 407, 978 N.Y.2d 152

This text of 113 A.D.3d 407 (Douglas Elliman LLC v. 21-45 44th Drive LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas Elliman LLC v. 21-45 44th Drive LLC, 113 A.D.3d 407, 978 N.Y.2d 152 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

The provision of the agreement at issue states, “[A]dvances shall be fully reimbursed by [plaintiff] from the Commissions paid by [defendant] ... at a rate of twenty percent ... of [plaintiff]’s portion ... of each Commission . . . until [defendant] is fully reimbursed.” The motion court properly found that the requirement that defendants be “fully reimbursed” was qualified by the clause “from the Commissions ... at a rate of twenty percent ... of [plaintiff]’s portion of each Commission” (see Goldstein v Frances Emblems, Inc., 269 App Div 345, 347 [1st Dept 1945]). Although 20% of plaintiffs commissions may be insufficient to fully reimburse defendants for the advances made, defendants could have been protected by negotiating a clause addressing what would happen if 20% of plaintiffs commissions was insufficient to fully reimburse defendants (see Rowe v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 46 NY2d 62, 72 [1978]; see also Reiss v Financial Performance Corp., 97 NY2d 195, 199 [2001]). Concur — Sweeny, J.R, Acosta, Saxe, Moskowitz and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reiss v. Financial Performance Corp.
764 N.E.2d 958 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
385 N.E.2d 566 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Goldstein v. Frances Emblems, Inc.
269 A.D. 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.D.3d 407, 978 N.Y.2d 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-elliman-llc-v-21-45-44th-drive-llc-nyappdiv-2014.