Douglas E. Nalls v. Star Motors, LLC

359 F. App'x 127
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 4, 2010
Docket09-12346
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 359 F. App'x 127 (Douglas E. Nalls v. Star Motors, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas E. Nalls v. Star Motors, LLC, 359 F. App'x 127 (11th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Douglas E. Nalls appeals the sua sponte dismissal of his pro se breach-of-contract suit. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Miller v. Donald, 541 F.3d 1091, 1100 (11th Cir.2008); Bilal v. Driver, 251 F.3d 1346, 1349-50 (11th Cir.2001). Moreover, we note separately from the pleadings that the defendant STAR MOTORS, LLC is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Flori *128 da, and is likely a citizen of Florida for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. Therefore, we doubt that the district court was vested with subject-matter jurisdiction to hear this case because of a lack of diversity between the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1),-(c)(1); MacGinnitie v. Hobbs Group, LLC, 420 F.3d 1234, 1239 (11th Cir.2005); see also Nalls v. Mercedes Benz of Fort Lauderdale, No. 06-60081-CIV-COHN, 2008 WL 906777, at *1, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26157, at *1 (S.D.Fla. Apr.l, 2008).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 F. App'x 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-e-nalls-v-star-motors-llc-ca11-2010.