Douglas, Donald Ray
This text of Douglas, Donald Ray (Douglas, Donald Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to life years' imprisonment. The Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Douglas v. State, No. 10-92-233-CR (Tex. App. - Waco, March 31, 1993).
In the instant application, Applicant raises several grounds for review challenging the merits of his conviction. Additionally, Applicant claims that he is being improperly denied good time and work time credits.
This Court has previously refused to consider matters such as loss of good time credit, disciplinary proceedings and inmate classification by way of a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Palomo, 759 S.W.2d 671, 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988), citing Ex parte Brager, 704 S.W.2d 46 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). Therefore, Applicant's time credit claims are denied. Applicant's remaining claims are barred from review and are dismissed. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07 § 4.
Filed: January 9, 2013
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Douglas, Donald Ray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-donald-ray-texcrimapp-2013.