Douglas County Bank v. Bloomer
93 P. 141, 50 Or. 561
Opinion
Opinion by
This is an action by the Douglas County Bank against defendant to recover $300, with interest, alleged to be due plaintiff on a promissory note, in which the points involved are, in effect, the same as in Sutherlin v. Bloomer (decided on this date), 50 Or. 398 (93 Pac. 135), except as to the third error there urged.
The judgment of the trial court must accordingly be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Douglas County Bank v. Bloomer, 93 P. 141, 50 Or. 561 (Or. 1907).
93 P. 141 (Douglas County Bank v. Bloomer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marks v. Twohy Bros.
194 P. 675 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)