Douglas Carl Blum v. Douglas Clark Blum
This text of Douglas Carl Blum v. Douglas Clark Blum (Douglas Carl Blum v. Douglas Clark Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00286-CV ___________________________
DOUGLAS CARL BLUM, Appellant
V.
DOUGLAS CLARK BLUM, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016-004098-3
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On November 14, 2019, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed
as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with
the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam
Delivered: December 19, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Douglas Carl Blum v. Douglas Clark Blum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-carl-blum-v-douglas-clark-blum-texapp-2019.