Douglas Burke v. United American Acquisitions and Management Inc

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 2, 2011·No. 142398·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 2, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

141754 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly DOUGLAS BURKE, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant/ Justices Garnishor-Appellant, v SC: 141754 COA: 290590 Wayne CC: 04-433025-CZ UNITED AMERICAN ACQUISITIONS AND MANAGEMENT, INC. d/b/a UNITED AMERICAN FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., STONEPATH LOGISTICS DOMESTIC SERVICES, INC., and STONEPATH GROUP, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs, and RADIANT LOGISTICS GLOBAL SERVICES, INC., Garnishee Defendant-Intervenor, and MASS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Intervenor-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 5, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 2, 2011 _________________________________________ s0126 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas Burke v. United American Acquisitions and Management Inc, (Mich. 2011).

Douglas Burke v. United American Acquisitions and Management Inc (Douglas Burke v. United American Acquisitions and Management Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.