DOUGLAS BARCLAY v. DIANE SMITH and DONALD SCHLICHTMANN

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 30, 2023
Docket22-2088
StatusPublished

This text of DOUGLAS BARCLAY v. DIANE SMITH and DONALD SCHLICHTMANN (DOUGLAS BARCLAY v. DIANE SMITH and DONALD SCHLICHTMANN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DOUGLAS BARCLAY v. DIANE SMITH and DONALD SCHLICHTMANN, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DOUGLAS BARCLAY, Appellant,

v.

DIANE SMITH and DONALD SCHLICHTMANN, Appellees.

No. 4D22-2088

[March 30, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE16- 005080.

Bernardo Protano of Bernardo Protano, Esq., P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Robert Garven, Margate, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
DOUGLAS BARCLAY v. DIANE SMITH and DONALD SCHLICHTMANN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-barclay-v-diane-smith-and-donald-schlichtmann-fladistctapp-2023.