Douglas Ashcroft v. State of Oregon

398 F. App'x 301
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2010·No. 09-35305·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The district court properly dismissed Douglas Allen Ashcroft’s claims as time-barred. See Or.Rev.Stat. §§ 12.110(1), 30.275(9) (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims); Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 927 (9th Cir.2004) (“For actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, courts apply the forum state’s statute of limitations for personal injury actions[.]”); see also Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 388, 127 S.Ct. 1091, 166 L.Ed.2d 973 (2007) (statute begins to run' when the plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas Ashcroft v. State of Oregon, 398 F. App'x 301 (9th Cir. 2010).

398 F. App'x 301 (Douglas Ashcroft v. State of Oregon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashcroft v. Oregon
178 L. Ed. 2d 844 (Supreme Court, 2011)