Doughty v. Maxwell
376 U.S. 202, 84 S. Ct. 702, 11 L. Ed. 2d 650, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1732
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 24, 1964
Docket422, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by154 cases
This text of 376 U.S. 202 (Doughty v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Doughty v. Maxwell, 376 U.S. 202, 84 S. Ct. 702, 11 L. Ed. 2d 650, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1732 (1964).
Opinion
DOUGHTY
v.
MAXWELL, WARDEN.
Supreme Court of United States.
Petitioner pro se.
William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and William C. Baird, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 506, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Edgar Farfan-Galvan
389 P.3d 155 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2016)
Robert R. Cuppett v. Jack R. Duckworth, Superintendent, Indiana State Reformatory
8 F.3d 1132 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
Mastracchio v. Houle
416 A.2d 116 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1980)
Glen Prophet v. Jack Duckworth, Warden, Indiana State Prison
580 F.2d 926 (Seventh Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Lenardo
420 F. Supp. 1148 (D. New Jersey, 1976)
Robert Webster v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
505 F.2d 926 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
United States Ex Rel. Jones v. Rundle
358 F. Supp. 939 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
Rogelio Gutierrez v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
474 F.2d 899 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
Ex Parte Olvera
489 S.W.2d 586 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Curry v. State
488 S.W.2d 100 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Wilburn v. State
487 S.W.2d 600 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1972)
United States Ex Rel. Miscavage v. Howard County District Court
339 F. Supp. 292 (D. New Jersey, 1972)
United States v. Zirpolo
450 F.2d 424 (Third Circuit, 1971)
Commonwealth v. Bower
275 A.2d 109 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Baeza v. State
478 P.2d 903 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1970)
Thomas v. Department of Motor Vehicles
475 P.2d 858 (California Supreme Court, 1970)
United States of America Ex Rel. Murray Dickerson v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution,philadelphia, Pennsylvania
430 F.2d 462 (Third Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Kelly
314 F. Supp. 500 (E.D. New York, 1970)
United States v. Vallejo
312 F. Supp. 244 (S.D. New York, 1970)
Johnson v. State
263 A.2d 232 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
376 U.S. 202, 84 S. Ct. 702, 11 L. Ed. 2d 650, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doughty-v-maxwell-scotus-1964.