Dougherty's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dougherty's Appeal

9 A. 46, 6 Sadler 69, 20 Week. No. 29, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 605

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 4, 1887

DocketNo. 193, E. D.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 9 A. 46 (Dougherty's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dougherty's Appeal, 9 A. 46, 6 Sadler 69, 20 Week. No. 29, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 605 (Pa. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The services rendered by the appellant were undoubtedly meritorious so far as he is concerned. Inasmuch, however, as they were for the benefit of the trustee and in opposition to the interests of a cestui que trust, their property should not be applied to the payment of those services. The appellant must look [79]*79to the former trustee, to whom he rendered the services, for his compensation.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The services rendered by the appellant were undoubtedly meritorious so far as he is concerned. Inasmuch, however, as they were for the benefit of the trustee and in opposition to the interests of a cestui que trust, their property should not be applied to the payment of those services. The appellant must look [79]*79to the former trustee, to whom he rendered the services, for his compensation.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A. 46, 6 Sadler 69, 20 Week. No. 29, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doughertys-appeal-pa-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack