Dougherty v. William Penn Life Insurance

3 A.D.3d 469, 769 N.Y.S.2d 905
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[470] In an action to recover damages for a violation of General Business Law § 349, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), entered August 13, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs (see Randazzo v Gerber Life Ins. Co., 3 AD3d 485 [2004] [decided herewith]). Smith, J.P., Luciano, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dougherty v. William Penn Life Insurance, 3 A.D.3d 469, 769 N.Y.S.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

3 A.D.3d 469 (Dougherty v. William Penn Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
13 A.D.3d 289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Katz v. American Mayflower Life Insurance
14 A.D.3d 195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Topel v. Reliastar Life Insurance
6 A.D.3d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)