Dougherty v. Seigle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dougherty v. Seigle

264 A.D. 883, 36 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5241

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 883 (Dougherty v. Seigle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dougherty v. Seigle, 264 A.D. 883, 36 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action had not been commenced "within the time limited therefor, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The affidavits raised an issue of fact which must be tried. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action had not been commenced "within the time limited therefor, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The affidavits raised an issue of fact which must be tried. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 883, 36 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dougherty-v-seigle-nyappdiv-1942.