Dougherty v. Seigle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dougherty v. Seigle

264 A.D. 883, 36 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5241

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 1942·Published

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action had not been commenced "within the time limited therefor, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The affidavits raised an issue of fact which must be tried. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action had not been commenced "within the time limited therefor, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The affidavits raised an issue of fact which must be tried. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Dougherty v. Seigle, 264 A.D. 883, 36 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

264 A.D. 883 (Dougherty v. Seigle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.