Dougherty v. Payne

276 F. 451, 1921 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 976
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedJune 9, 1921
DocketNo. 1123
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 276 F. 451 (Dougherty v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dougherty v. Payne, 276 F. 451, 1921 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 976 (S.D. Fla. 1921).

Opinion

CALL, District Judge.

This cause comes on for a hearing upon the motion for leave to file an amended declaration. Heretofore, on May 27th insti, a demurrer was sustained to the declaration.

The fifth ground of the demurrer raised the question whether an action for malicious prosecution could be brought against the Director General of Railroads, as such officer, for the actions of one of the employees of a railroad system under his control. A careful study of the acts of Congress covering the governmental control of transportation systems seems to me to answer this question in the negative. Such being my view, no purpose would be subserved in granting the motion to amend, and it will therefore be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Teague
256 S.W. 957 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Hines v. Gravins
112 S.E. 869 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 F. 451, 1921 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dougherty-v-payne-flsd-1921.