Dougherty v. North Wisconsin Railway Co.

36 Wis. 402
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1874·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lyon, J.

The action was brought to recover an unpaid balance for work and labor alleged to have been performed by the plaintiffs for the defendant. The cause was tried before a referee, who found and reported that the plaintiffs were entitled to judgment for the sum demanded in the complaint. The circuit court confirmed such report, and gave judgment in accordance therewith, and the defendant has appealed therefrom.

We find no bill of exceptions in the record. It is the settled law of this state, that, on appeal, this court cannot review the finding of facts by the referee, or his conclusions of law thereon, unless the same, and the exceptions thereto taken in the circuit court, be preserved in a bill of exceptions regularly settled and signed by the judge. Gilbank v. Stephenson, 30 Wis., 157. [404] We Rave, therefore, nothing before us for review but the pleadings and judgment. Beyond all question the complaint states a cause of action, and the judgment is supported by the complaint. This is all we can decide on this appeal.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dougherty v. North Wisconsin Railway Co., 36 Wis. 402 (Wis. 1874).

36 Wis. 402 (Dougherty v. North Wisconsin Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edleman v. Kidd
26 N.W. 116 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1885)