Dougherty v. North Wisconsin Railway Co.
This text of 36 Wis. 402 (Dougherty v. North Wisconsin Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action was brought to recover an unpaid balance for work and labor alleged to have been performed by the plaintiffs for the defendant. The cause was tried before a referee, who found and reported that the plaintiffs were entitled to judgment for the sum demanded in the complaint. The circuit court confirmed such report, and gave judgment in accordance therewith, and the defendant has appealed therefrom.
We find no bill of exceptions in the record. It is the settled law of this state, that, on appeal, this court cannot review the finding of facts by the referee, or his conclusions of law thereon, unless the same, and the exceptions thereto taken in the circuit court, be preserved in a bill of exceptions regularly settled and signed by the judge. Gilbank v. Stephenson, 30 Wis., 157. [404]*404We Rave, therefore, nothing before us for review but the pleadings and judgment. Beyond all question the complaint states a cause of action, and the judgment is supported by the complaint. This is all we can decide on this appeal.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 Wis. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dougherty-v-north-wisconsin-railway-co-wis-1874.