Dougherty v. McMillan

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Dougherty v. McMillan

25 Misc. 782

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Misc. 782 (Dougherty v. McMillan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dougherty v. McMillan, 25 Misc. 782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition does not allege, nor do: the proofs show, that the petitioner had any interest whatever in the premises in suit.

The proceedings were, therefore, properly dismissed by the trial justice (Code of Civ. Pro., § 2235; Potter v. New York Bap. Mission Society, 23 Misc. Rep. 671; Ross v. Same, id. 683), and it follows that the final order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ..

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition does not allege, nor do: the proofs show, that the petitioner had any interest whatever in the premises in suit.

The proceedings were, therefore, properly dismissed by the trial justice (Code of Civ. Pro., § 2235; Potter v. New York Bap. Mission Society, 23 Misc. Rep. 671; Ross v. Same, id. 683), and it follows that the final order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ..

Order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Misc. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dougherty-v-mcmillan-nyappterm-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack