Dougherty v. McKelheer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Dougherty v. McKelheer

431 P.2d 863, 163 Colo. 570, 1967 Colo. LEXIS 928

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedSeptember 25, 1967

DocketNo. 21918

StatusPublished

This text of 431 P.2d 863 (Dougherty v. McKelheer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dougherty v. McKelheer, 431 P.2d 863, 163 Colo. 570, 1967 Colo. LEXIS 928 (Colo. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

In an action brought by Huida McKelheer a judgment was entered in her favor against Rodger Dougherty for the sum of $2,329.39, which was the amount claimed to be due on a promissory note admittedly executed and delivered by Dougherty payable to McKelheer.

The points urged for reversal of the judgment, namely, that the trial court erred in denying a motion for change of venue, and that there was no evidence as to what the law of the State of Washington was with regard to the “validity of the promissory note,” are without merit. No good purpose would be served in further comment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Sutton, Mr. Justice Pringle and Mr. Justice Kelley concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI