Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

228 A.D. 624
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1929·No. (Actions Nos. 4 and 3·Published

Opinion

— Orders reversed, ■with ten dollars costs and disbursements, plaintiff’s motions to strike out 1st, 2d, 5th, 6th, 10th and 11th defenses granted, and defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that all the questions presented upon these appeals have been fully adjudicated and established favorably to thd ’eoiitention of -the appellant by decisions of this court and of the Court of Appeals, ’ notably in Sliosberg v. New York Life Ins. Co., No. 2 (217 App. Div. 685) and Sokoloff v. National City Bank (239 N. Y. 158), and that under said decisions none of said questions may be regarded as open. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ. [135.Misc. 103.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 228 A.D. 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

228 A.D. 624 (Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sokoloff v. National City Bank
145 N.E. 917 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)
Sliosberg v. New York Life Insurance
217 A.D. 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)