Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

228 A.D. 624

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1929

Docket(Actions Nos. 4 and 3

StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D. 624 (Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 228 A.D. 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

— Orders reversed, ■with ten dollars costs and disbursements, plaintiff’s motions to strike out 1st, 2d, 5th, 6th, 10th and 11th defenses granted, and defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that all the questions presented upon these appeals have been fully adjudicated and established favorably to thd ’eoiitention of -the appellant by decisions of this court and of the Court of Appeals, ’ notably in Sliosberg v. New York Life Ins. Co., No. 2 (217 App. Div. 685) and Sokoloff v. National City Bank (239 N. Y. 158), and that under said decisions none of said questions may be regarded as open. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ. [135.Misc. 103.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Orders reversed, ■with ten dollars costs and disbursements, plaintiff’s motions to strike out 1st, 2d, 5th, 6th, 10th and 11th defenses granted, and defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that all the questions presented upon these appeals have been fully adjudicated and established favorably to thd ’eoiitention of -the appellant by decisions of this court and of the Court of Appeals, ’ notably in Sliosberg v. New York Life Ins. Co., No. 2 (217 App. Div. 685) and Sokoloff v. National City Bank (239 N. Y. 158), and that under said decisions none of said questions may be regarded as open. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ. [135.Misc. 103.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 A.D. 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dougherty-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-of-the-united-states-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack