Dougherty v. Custom Cellular, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dougherty v. Custom Cellular, Inc.

543 S.W.3d 76

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 13, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105873

StatusPublished

This text of 543 S.W.3d 76 (Dougherty v. Custom Cellular, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dougherty v. Custom Cellular, Inc., 543 S.W.3d 76 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Sean Dougherty ("Claimant") appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission disqualifying him *77from unemployment benefits after his termination from his employment with Custom Cellular, Inc. because of misconduct connected with work. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Sean Dougherty ("Claimant") appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission disqualifying him *77from unemployment benefits after his termination from his employment with Custom Cellular, Inc. because of misconduct connected with work. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 S.W.3d 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dougherty-v-custom-cellular-inc-moctapp-2018.