Dougherty v. Andrews
52 A. 47, 202 Pa. 633, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 575
Opinion
Opinion by
The only error complained of on this appeal is the granting of a new trial by the court below. The verdict was for the defendant, which, on application of the plaintiff, for reasons assigned, was set aside and a new trial awarded. The testimony taken in the case is not before us ; but, from the résumé of it in the judge’s charge, his discretion in setting aside the verdict was not abused, and the order making the rule for a new trial absolute is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dougherty v. Andrews, 52 A. 47, 202 Pa. 633, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 575 (Pa. 1902).
52 A. 47 (Dougherty v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hess v. Stiner
19 A.2d 560 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Larimer, Trustee v. Cambria Co.
191 A. 646 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. Giacobello
121 A. 333 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Hade v. Cumberland Valley Railroad
42 Pa. Super. 488 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)