Dougfield v. State
529 So. 2d 823, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1935, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3683, 1988 WL 84048
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 1988·No. No. 87-1168·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The state concedes that a remand for resentencing within the guidelines is required where, as here, the trial court has failed to set forth reasons for deviating from the sentencing guidelines. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dougfield v. State, 529 So. 2d 823, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1935, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3683, 1988 WL 84048 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
529 So. 2d 823 (Dougfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rangel v. State
532 So. 2d 84 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)