Doudell v. Shoo
This text of 158 Cal. 50 (Doudell v. Shoo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application of the appellants for ■ an order of this court fixing the amount for which the appellants shall give an undertaking on appeal, under sections 943 and 945 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is denied. The judgment appealed from directed the delivery of both real and personal property. In such cases the above-named sections require the judge of the court from which the appeal is taken to fix the amount of the undertaking to be given to obtain the statutory stay of proceedings on that part of the judgment. The supreme court has no jurisdiction to fix the amount for such undertaking. If the judge of the court below refuses to perform his plain statutory duty in this respect, the remedy of the appellant is to apply to this court for a writ of mandate to compel him to do so.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 Cal. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doudell-v-shoo-cal-1910.